UCSF's Glantz Slams Hollywood's Lax Enforcement of Tobacco Rating
A gadfly with giant wings, UCSF's Stan Glantz, PhD, knows how to cause a stir. For decades, Glantz, a UCSF professor of medicine, has used an insinuating style, relentless advocacy and scientific evidence to champion — often effectively — increasingly stringent tobacco controls around the world. Indeed, it is a tribute to Glantz's reputation that when the famous Brown & Williamson Tobacco Papers were leaked in 1994, he and UCSF were the recipients.
Glantz's subsequent publishing of these 4,000 pages of internal industry documents in a book called The Cigarette Papers earned him the undying enmity of tobacco companies and iconic status among health advocates and public policymakers.
His latest campaign -- to ban smoking in the movies -- has tied the social consequences of smoking to its continued glamorization in film. The following press release from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, quotes Glantz liberally.
For Immediate Release:
May 28, 2008 L.A. County Department of Public Health Urges Hollywood to Seriously Address Movies' Impact on Teen Smoking Anti-Smoking Movie Trailer Debuts, Along with Research Showing Hollywood's 2007 Pledge to Address Smoking in Movies Aimed at Youth is Lackluster LOS ANGELES – Today the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health marked the one-year anniversary of the Motion Picture Association of America's (MPAA) pledge to address the impact of smoking in movies aimed at teen audiences by calling the MPAA's efforts lackluster. Public Health, joined by representatives from the California Medical Association, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Smoke-free Movies Project, Sacramento Breathe Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Project, and the American Medical Association Alliance urged Hollywood to address the fact that smoking in movies is a powerful pro-tobacco influence on children. New research released by Public Health confirms the effect smoking in movies is having on California youth between 13 and 17 years of age. Key findings include:
May 28, 2008 L.A. County Department of Public Health Urges Hollywood to Seriously Address Movies' Impact on Teen Smoking Anti-Smoking Movie Trailer Debuts, Along with Research Showing Hollywood's 2007 Pledge to Address Smoking in Movies Aimed at Youth is Lackluster LOS ANGELES – Today the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health marked the one-year anniversary of the Motion Picture Association of America's (MPAA) pledge to address the impact of smoking in movies aimed at teen audiences by calling the MPAA's efforts lackluster. Public Health, joined by representatives from the California Medical Association, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Smoke-free Movies Project, Sacramento Breathe Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Project, and the American Medical Association Alliance urged Hollywood to address the fact that smoking in movies is a powerful pro-tobacco influence on children. New research released by Public Health confirms the effect smoking in movies is having on California youth between 13 and 17 years of age. Key findings include:
- Among youth who reported seeing smoking in movies occasionally or hardly ever, only 13.5 percent started smoking. That number jumped dramatically to 21.8 percent among youth who reported seeing smoking in almost all movies.
- 37 percent of teens who said they saw frequent tobacco use by actors in movies, videos and on TV admitted that they also smoke or have tried smoking.
- Among Asian-American youth who reported seeing smoking in movies occasionally or hardly ever, 11.3 percent started smoking. However, that number jumped more than three times to 38.9 percent among those who reported seeing smoking in almost all movies.
- Among Latino youth who reported seeing smoking in movies occasionally or hardly ever, 12.6 percent started smoking. That number more than doubled to 27.3 percent among those who reported seeing smoking in almost all movies.
- Rating new movies that show tobacco use "R". The only exception should be when the presentation of tobacco clearly and unambiguously reflects the dangers and consequences of tobacco use or is necessary to represent the smoking of a real historical figure;
- Certification that there were no pay-offs for using or displaying tobacco;
- No tobacco brand identification;
- Strong anti-smoking ads before movies with smoking.