John Plotts, senior vice chancellor of Finance and Administration, today (January 21) issued an email letter to the UCSF community about the San Francisco Chronicle story on incentive pay for some UCSF employees. Below is his email letter in its entirety. Dear Colleagues: I write to make you aware of a story in the SF Chronicle today concerning performance-based incentive pay approved for about 1,500 UCSF employees, including union represented and non-represented staff, related fiscal year 2008-2009. The incentive pay ranged between 1 percent and 15 percent of annual salary, with most employees receiving less than $3,000. A few top managers got a higher payment. Most of the employees are in Financial and Administrative Services, where all 1,337, 2008-2009 employees received the payment, along with some managers in the School of Medicine and School of Dentistry. Although the Chronicle article puts this in the context of recent and future UC cuts, I want to emphasize a few key points:
- The incentive payments were awarded based on prescribed goals for the employees including – as the Chronicle reports – cost-savings measures here at UCSF. The item on the Regents agenda yesterday reflects payments made late last year after a one-time approval for 2008-2009 incentive plans; that plan has been suspended indefinitely in light of current budget concerns and at the direction of the Regents.
- This item was thoroughly reviewed by the UC Office of the President. These payments – and payments for similar programs at other campuses – were referred to a retired judge to determine whether they were legally binding incentive plans or non-binding bonus arrangements. The judge denied some claims and affirmed others, determining UC was legally obligated to pay the incentive payment to the UCSF employees.
- At President Yudof’s request, the Regents in January 2009 voted to suspend incentive and bonus payments for non-clinical employees – seven months before furloughs and pay cuts were implemented. That suspension also postponed discussion here at UCSF of any plans to expand incentive programs to other employees across the campus at this time. However, University and campus leaders continue to support “at risk,” incentive-based plans, tied to employee performance, to retain and attract the top talent we need to remain a world-class health sciences campus.