This page is in an archival section of the web site; the information may be outdated.
For current content, please visit UCSF Today at http://www.ucsf.edu/today/

UCSF logo

ArchivesCalendarCampus NotesCampus EyeLife StyleQuickLinksHelp ResourcesSearch

Daybreak home

Today's
Headlines

This Week's
News

Daybreak News Story
     

1st appeared 6 April 1999

Physician Financial Incentives May Harm Quality of Patient Care

A new study by a team of researchers at UCSF presents evidence that doctors may withhold needed services from patients in response to financial incentives to control costs.

In a nationwide survey of internists, UCSF researchers also found that up to 50 percent of physicians in managed care settings and 39 percent of physicians in fee-for-service settings failed to prescribe services recommended by national guidelines. The more restrictive the financial incentive, the less likely physicians would order recommended tests or referrals. The study appears in the March issue of the Western Journal of Medicine.

"This study shows that patient care may be compromised regardless of what financial incentives are in place," said Steven Pantilat, lead author and assistant professor of medicine at UCSF. "That can erode the public's trust."

Compared to fee-for-service plans, the restrictions of managed care resulted in a decrease of 3 percent to 11 percent of physicians stating that they would order the appropriate tests and referrals. Although the researchers' findings suggest that incentives in managed care do lead physicians to withhold needed services, financial motives should not be singled out as the only factor influencing doctors' decisions, said Pantilat.

Questionnaires were mailed to 1,030 general internists who belonged to the American College of Physicians and practiced in metropolitan areas with populations of more than 250,000 where at least 30 percent of insured people belonged to managed care plans, said Pantilat. In the survey, physicians were given four patient scenarios and asked to determine whether they would prescribe the test or referral recommended by national guidelines designed to identify or rule out life-threatening illnesses. The physicians made their treatment decisions working under various fictitious combinations of financial incentives and assessments of need.

In all cases, physicians working under the assumption of the most restrictive managed care plan said they would order fewer services than physicians working under the assumption of a fee-for-service plan.

"Because there has been concern in the medical community that financial incentives in managed care will lead physicians to withhold necessary services, we wanted to see if managed care members were getting sub-optimal care," said Pantilat. "We did see a tendency toward offering fewer services to managed care patients, but we also found that a significant number of all physicians did not follow nationally accepted guidelines for care, regardless of the incentives."

Based on their results, the researchers believe the medical community needs better quality control measures to ensure that physicians provide the recommended services.

"We need to establish a system that is more responsive to the needs of the patient," said Margaret Chesney, UCSF professor of medicine and co-author of the paper.

Source: Rebecca Sladek Nowlis, News Services


DAYBREAK | ARCHIVES | CALENDAR | CAMPUS NOTES
CAMPUS EYE | LIFESTYLE | QUICK LINKS | HELP/RESOURCES | SEARCH

Copyright ©1999 Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Last Updated May 11, 1999.
Please direct all comments and questions to the Daybreak Editor .
Please contact the UCSF Web Developer for questions of a technical nature.

New contact address: today@pubaff.ucsf.edu