| Defense
Department Plays Big Part in Fight Against Breast Cancer Five years ago, scientists and
research advocates never thought that one of its most
valuable allies in the war against breast cancer
would turn out to be the US Department of Defense (DOD).
Since 1992, however, the
DOD has spent nearly $500 million on breast cancer
research, and it is second only to the National Cancer
Institute in funding studies on the disease that strikes
some 200,000 women a year.
A new report by the
Institute of Medicine says that the DOD's Breast Cancer
Research Program has grown to fill a unique niche among
breast cancer research supporters. Because it encourages
new ideas and holds promise for scientific breakthroughs
in the fight against cancer, the report recommends
continuing the program with more stable funding and ways
to monitor its success.
UCSF surgeon Laura
Esserman, who directs the UCSF Breast Care Center, could
not agree more. The DOD funds two clinical studies in
which she is a co-researcher -- one testing a vaccine for
women with advanced breast cancer and another exploring
how MRI can best be applied to diagnosing and treating
the disease. Its money also has provided the backbone for
a "one-stop" patient-focused breast care
center.
Last year, UCSF and the
California Pacific Medical Center received a $4.3 million
DOD grant to start and study the Bay Area Breast Care
Center where a team of experts -- including radiologists,
surgeons, pathologists and cancer specialists -- work
together on the same unit. The team approach has been
used widely, from making treatment decisions and
measuring quality and cost of care to developing
educational programs and devising projects to study
alternative mind-body and spiritually oriented
psychotherapy methods. The center could serve as a
national model if the study does prove that single-site
integrated programs offer advantages to the patient over
decentralized systems, says Esserman.
The IOM report recommends
more of these kinds of studies. Research into genetic,
cellular and molecular events involved in breast cancer
have garnered more than half the DOD funds awarded so
far. Those studies should continue. However, the reports
says more funding should now be steered toward research
on how genetic risks interact with environmental or
non-genetic risk factors; how to translate knowledge of
genetic and cellular roots of breast cancer into improved
detection, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and follow-up
care; how risk, disease, treatment and ongoing care
affect the psychosocial and clinical outcomes of breast
cancer patients and their families; and how to ensure
that all women have access to high-quality,
cost-effective care.
The roots of the DOD
Breast Cancer Research Program go back only to 1992, when
Congress appropriated $25 million for research on the
screening and diagnosis of breast cancer for women in the
military and dependents. But a strong lobbying effort by
women's health advocates in 1993 worked in getting
Congress to raise the appropriation to $210 million and
to stipulate that the money be used to support a
peer-reviewed competitive grants program aimed at
reducing the incidence of breast cancer, increasing
survival rates, and improving the quality of life for
those with the disease. Part of what makes the DOD
program unique, says the IOM report, is its inclusion of
breast cancer survivors and other consumer advocates as
voting members of the scientific panels that review grant
proposals and set broad program goals.
Unlike the NCI, which
awards grants based on the best science, the DOD money
goes to scientists who show their research is
specifically aimed at breast cancer, says Esserman. In
the first five years, she says, the panels have set a
clear tone. "They look for innovativeness and
research that has a true translational focus."
The programs, she says,
encourages scientists from different fields to work
together. It has attracted to breast cancer research some
of the most "creative scientists -- those not afraid
to go out on a limb with their work," says Esserman.
By Andy Evangelista
1st appeared 8/18/97
|